DeConcini McDonald Yetwin & Lacy, P.C (2024)

I suspect that in my grandparents’ day, no homeowner would have thought that he or she could control what color the neighbors could or couldn’t paint their houses. Boy, have things changed. Now, it’s news when someone paints their house an obnoxious color and dares the neighbors to do something about it.

Three news items I have seen recently really illustrate the point. In one, a homeowner painted his house in a color called “gold zinger.” I haven’t seen any photos of the house (or chips of the paint), so I can’t tell you what “gold zinger” looks like. I can tell you that at least some of this homeowner’s neighbors didn’t like “gold zinger,” so they complained to an agency known as the Historical Areas Board of Review. The members of the board apparently didn’t like “gold zinger” either. More importantly, the homeowner was required to get the board’s approval of the color before painting his house. This meant that the board apparently had the authority (although one report indicated that there was some uncertainty about this) to tell the homeowner that “gold zinger” had to go. The outcome is that the homeowner is going to repaint the house in a color called “semolina,” which I haven’t seen either but was described as a “creamier yellow.” I guess “semolina” is less zingy than “gold zinger.”

In the second news item, a homeowner painted his house a loud color. A very loud color. I have seen photos of this one. It’s the color of Pepto-Bismol, only brighter. This homeowner’s neighbors have complained too, apparently. This time, however, the homeowner is winning the argument, and gloating about it. What’s the difference between the Pepto-Bismol colored house and the house painted in “gold zinger”? The Pepto-Bismol-colored house is in a neighborhood that isn’t subject to any rules. Like in my grandparents’ day, there’s no historical board, no homeowners’ association, nothing like that. The neighbors can complain all they want, but there doesn’t appear to be any authority that can be brought to bear to force the homeowner to paint his house a less jarring color. He says it’s his favorite color and he’s not going to change it.

Can’t the city do something about it, you ask? Not unless the city has a provision in its zoning or building code that governs such things, which would be pretty unusual. I know there are some cities (Florence, Italy is one, I have heard) where the outward appearance of all buildings, whether new or renovated, is controlled to preserve a particular architectural aesthetic. In a historic city like Florence, that makes sense. That’s just the historical board on a citywide basis.

That brings me to the third news item. This time the house that is attracting attention is an old house built of yellow brick. Inexplicably, and perhaps mistakenly according to the news account, the unpainted yellow brick facade was recently painted black. The city building inspector notified the owner that because the house is in a “design district,” it couldn’t be painted without the approval of the city’s design commission. The owner is now reportedly trying to remove the black paint without damaging the brick, much to the dismay of everyone.

The design district in that story sounds like a larger-scale, and government-administered, version of the design review process that exists in many private residential enclaves. Rather than being tied to a historic architectural aesthetic, however, in those enclaves the goal is purely aesthetic, with the objective being to keep out anything that looks too different.

Does that kind of aesthetic control on a large scale make sense in a suburban municipality in the United States? Not, in my opinion, it doesn’t. But here’s the beauty of the free market. If you want to live in a community where there are rules abut what color your neighbors can paint their houses, and there is a governing body to enforce those rules, you can choose such a community. There are lots of them. Those communities are called planned communities. The rules in those communities are called covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs). And the governing body that enforces those rules is called the homeowners’ association (or perhaps the architectural review committee of the homeowners’ association).

On the other hand, if you want to paint your house a loud color, you can choose to buy a house where there is no historical board or homeowners’ association. Then you can paint your house “gold zinger” if you like. You can even paint your house the color of Pepto-Bismol, although I would hope that you wouldn’t. And yes, you can even paint it black.

DeConcini McDonald Yetwin & Lacy, P.C (2)

Nathan B. Hannahis a Shareholder in the Tucson office, and practices in the areas of estate planning and administration,real estate, and commercial transactions. He is also a noted blogger, and you can find more of his articles on hisprivate blog,

Contact Attorney Hannah: nhannah@dmyl.com or 520/ 322-5000

This communication is designed to bring legal developments of interest to the attention of our clients and others. It should not be relied upon as a substitute for specific legal advice in a particular matter. For further information on any of the subjects discussed, or for legal advice in connection with any particular matter, please contact us.

DeConcini McDonald Yetwin & Lacy, P.C (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Stevie Stamm

Last Updated:

Views: 6128

Rating: 5 / 5 (60 voted)

Reviews: 83% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Stevie Stamm

Birthday: 1996-06-22

Address: Apt. 419 4200 Sipes Estate, East Delmerview, WY 05617

Phone: +342332224300

Job: Future Advertising Analyst

Hobby: Leather crafting, Puzzles, Leather crafting, scrapbook, Urban exploration, Cabaret, Skateboarding

Introduction: My name is Stevie Stamm, I am a colorful, sparkling, splendid, vast, open, hilarious, tender person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.